Trap-neuter-vaccinate-return: What is it?
Trap-neuter-vaccinate-return (TNVR) is a humane, non-lethal alternative to the trap-and-kill method of attempting to manage cat populations. TNVR is a management technique in which community cats (aka stray or outdoor cats) are humanely trapped for the purpose of transporting them to a spay/neuter clinic, where they are evaluated and sterilized by a licensed veterinarian, vaccinated against rabies and ear-tipped* for identification. Following recovery, the cats are returned to the location where they were humanely trapped so they can live out their lives.
TNVR is a key component of a comprehensive community cat program (CCP), along with community outreach and nuisance mitigation techniques. CCPs are the most humane and effective way to manage outdoor cat populations while also reducing their potential impacts on wildlife populations and public health.
*Ear-tipping involves the removal of the tip of one ear while the cat is under anesthesia for spay/neuter surgery. It is the universal sign that a cat is sterilized.
What is the primary benefit of TNVR?
In the long term, targeted TNVR can lower the number of cats in the community more effectively than trap-and-kill. TNVR provides a non-lethal, humane way to effectively manage community cat populations while also addressing common nuisance behaviors. Several studies have shown that TNVR programs can decrease and sometimes eliminate outdoor cat populations over time by reducing the breeding population.
What are the other benefits of TNVR?
The benefits to both cats and communities are numerous:
- These programs create safer communities and promote public health by reducing the number of unvaccinated cats.
- Sterilizing community cats reduces or even eliminates the behaviors that can lead to nuisance complaints.
- TNVR programs improve the lives of community cats. When males are neutered, they are no longer compelled to maintain a large territory or fight over mates, and females are no longer forced to endure the physical and mental demands of giving birth and caring for their young.
- In neighborhoods across the country, good Samaritans serve as caregivers, providing food, water and shelter for cats who’ve been through TNVR, and that attention improves the cats’ overall health.
- TNVR reduces shelter admissions and operating costs. (Studies have shown that generally less than 1% of community cats in TNVR programs are too sick or injured to be returned to their neighborhoods.)
- Fewer community cats in shelters increases adoption rates, because more space opens up in shelters for adoptable cats.
Another benefit of TNVR is the positive impact that these programs have on animal control officers and shelter workers. Job satisfaction among these employees increases tremendously when their work does not involve killing healthy animals for the purpose of convenience. This increased job satisfaction results in less employee turnover and an overall improved public image of the shelter. The reduction in killing and animal admissions also provides more time for staff and volunteers to care for the animals in the shelter and give personal attention to potential adopters.
Equally important, TNVR programs allow animal control facilities to take advantage of numerous resources (e.g., volunteers, grant funding) typically unavailable to shelters that use the traditional trap-and-kill method. Understandably, people are rarely inclined to volunteer for programs that fail to make them feel good about themselves. Through the implementation of TNVR, volunteers know they are making a positive difference in the lives of animals, and the community is benefiting from their charitable efforts.
Volunteers help trap cats and assist animal control in locating other cats in need of TNVR services. Community cat caregivers identify new cats coming into the area so that they, too, can be sterilized, vaccinated and returned. In a well-managed TNVR program, critical data is collected that can be used when seeking grant funding to expand the program.
Why is TNVR preferable to lethal control?
TNVR is a practical solution to the failed policy of trap-and-kill. Lethal control has been used by animal control agencies for decades, but given the current problem of large populations of outdoor cats, it is obvious that killing as a form of population control does not work. In addition, killing animals as a means of population control is unpalatable to the public. By contrast, TNVR puts an end to this perpetual cycle of killing and makes it possible to maintain a community of cats at a relatively stable number of sterilized cats unable to multiply.
Why does the trap-and-kill method fail to curtail community cat populations?
Populations rebound to previous levels following trap-and-kill. Every habitat has a carrying capacity, the maximum population size of a given species that can be sustained in a particular area. This carrying capacity is determined by the availability of food sources, water, shelter and other environmental necessities. When a portion of the sustainable population is removed (e.g., by trapping and killing them) and the availability of resources is unaltered, the remaining animals respond through an increase in births and higher survival rates.
Because of this biological certainty, trapping and removing cats from a given area does little more than ensure that the cat population will rebound to its original level, necessitating additional trapping and killing. While lethal control may rid an area of cats temporarily, it is not an effective long-term solution because new cats will quickly fill the vacated area and breed, resulting in a perpetual cycle of killing.
How does TNVR compare to the traditional trap-and-kill method in terms of costs?
Trapping and killing cats is not only unpalatable to the public, it’s a costly and ineffective method of population control.
TNVR programs are being adopted by towns and municipalities across the nation out of necessity and common sense. This shift is being seen on many municipal levels as animal services’ budgets continue to be slashed and the need for better tools to handle animal control issues has become increasingly evident. As Mark Kumpf, 2010 president of the National Animal Control Association, told Animal Sheltering in 2008: “The cost for picking up and simply euthanizing and disposing of animals is horrendous, in both the philosophical and the economic sense.”
The cost savings associated with TNVR are location-specific and accurate estimates involve taking into account numerous variables. The immediate savings that many communities experience are a result of tapping into volunteer support and other resources (e.g., private donations) that come from implementing a humane method of managing community cats. Cost savings fluctuate based on the type of TNVR program implemented, the extent of animal control involvement, the volunteer base available and the community’s overall support of TNVR. The point, however, is that over time, through attrition and sterilization efforts, fewer cats will be breeding and contributing to the population growth. And fewer animals to contend with inevitably means a decrease in the demand on taxpayer dollars.
Until a TNVR program begins, it is difficult to calculate accurately how much money will be saved, either directly or indirectly. A successful TNVR program can improve the public image of a municipality, which may add to economic development. Employee satisfaction within the shelter and animal control facilities is also a huge asset and contributes to a positive image of the community. The hometown pride and enthusiasm generated from supporting a non-lethal, practical and effective solution to a community concern must be factored into the equation, even if the resulting cost savings are difficult to calculate.
Do community cats pose a risk to public health?
Rabies and toxoplasmosis are two diseases often raised during discussions about outdoor cats. The CDC recommends that cats be vaccinated against rabies, which is a key component of most TNVR programs.
It’s important, however, to put both of these serious human health threats into proper perspective. Since 1960, only two cases of human rabies in the U.S. have been attributed to cats. According to the website for the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), rabies in domestic animals is rare. Wild animals accounted for approximately 93% of reported cases of rabies in 2018. And the possibility of humans contracting toxoplasmosis from cats is rather unlikely and, as the CDC explains, the risk is generally mitigated through simple hand-washing.
How serious a threat are cats to bird populations?
TNVR means fewer cats, which means fewer threats to birds. Other factors pose more serious threats to bird populations. As the United Kingdom’s Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB) has pointed out for years: “There is no clear scientific evidence that (predation by cats) is causing bird populations to decline,” because “cats tend to take weak or sickly birds.” Indeed, the RSPB notes, “It is likely that most of the birds killed by cats would have died anyway from other causes before the next breeding season, so cats are unlikely to have a major impact on populations.”
Although no studies support the misleading claims that cats are destroying songbird populations, there’s no disputing that cats do, in fact, kill birds. The point that must be emphasized is that fewer cats means less predation. That being the case, TNVR should not be condemned because of potential threats to wildlife, but rather embraced so that outdoor cat populations can be curtailed as efficiently as possible to minimize potential predatory behavior.
Are there any tools to help keep community cats out of designated areas?
Non-lethal deterrents for cats are effective and readily accessible. There are numerous cat deterrents available on the market today, several of which are discussed in this video produced by Best Friends.
What about the dangers faced by community cats?
Community cats can live long, healthy lives. According to a study conducted by Dr. Julie Levy at the University of Central Florida, the majority of cats (83%) in the 11 cat groups studied were present on the campus for more than six years. It’s quite likely that many of the observed cats far exceeded that life span, since approximately one-half of the free-roaming cats first observed in the study were already adults, so their true ages were unknown. Furthermore, according to Dr. Levy, the body weights of these free-roaming cats, when compared with pet cats in previous studies, exhibited “no significant differences.” Neutering these cats resulted in an increase in body weight and healthy overall body condition.
Other studies reported similar findings. For instance, from 1993 to 2004, seven TNR organizations throughout the nation collected data on more than 100,000 free-roaming cats examined in spay/neuter clinics. Less than 1% of these animals needed to be euthanized because of debilitating conditions, trauma or infectious diseases.
Why are bans on feeding outdoor cats ineffective?
It’s bad public policy to criminalize kindness. Feeding bans are notoriously ineffective primarily because they are impossible to enforce. Also, human nature rarely allows someone to sit idly by while an animal suffers. When a hungry animal appears, compassion prevails. Consequently, people will not adhere to an ordinance discouraging the feeding of animals in need.
Hungry cats can continue to reproduce, which further undermines the intent of most feeding prohibitions. Equally important, feeding bans jeopardize the ongoing sterilization and vaccination services provided by caregivers who diligently monitor outdoor cats in their communities. Finally, once feeding by humans is prohibited, hungry cats are forced to compete with wildlife over available natural food sources.
Does TNVR encourage the abandonment of cats?
Cats will be abandoned with or without TNVR. In fact, cats have been abandoned for as long as people have had pet cats, which is why TNVR is necessary today. These periodic abandonments, however, will not derail the overall success of a TNVR program because a group of cats can absorb the occasional newcomer yet still show a significant population reduction when most of the animals are sterilized. Indeed, the monitoring that is an integral part of most TNVR programs ensures that new arrivals are sterilized and vaccinated.
In addition, maintaining a local group of cats who’ve been through a TNVR program is likely not the determining factor behind whether someone abandons a pet or not. Surely there are a variety of other issues that factor into this irresponsible behavior. However, efforts should be made to place feeding stations in out-of-the-way locations to minimize the likelihood of desperate people illegally abandoning their pet cats. Other strategies should also be employed to further reduce potential abandonment, such as posting signs about abandonment ordinances at high-profile locations where community cats live.
Do local laws affect community cats and TNVR caregivers?
Many municipalities, dissatisfied with the ineffectiveness of trap-and-kill programs, are turning to TNVR as a humane, effective alternative for dealing with outdoor cat populations. Unfortunately, outdated laws sometimes conflict with this well-intentioned plan.
Poorly crafted ordinances may create legal obstacles to caregivers who actively participate in TNVR programs. To alleviate the negative legal consequences, municipalities that implement TNVR programs should interpret current ordinances so that community cats, and the generous caregivers who support them, are exempted from these burdensome provisions, or revise them accordingly. If you want to work with other people in your community to support TNVR efforts, you can start by joining the 2025 Action Team.
Is it necessary to have a local ordinance allowing TNVR?
An ordinance allowing or endorsing TNVR is often not needed. In fact, handling TNVR through shelter policies allows for a more fluid and successful program because you might not have to work through an ordinance change to adapt the program quickly.
However, when crafted properly, an ordinance that encourages TNVR establishes reasonable standards and defines duties for the individuals instrumental in implementing a community cat program. This type of legislation grants credibility to TNVR, promotes community involvement, and encourages the cooperation of cat caregivers and the shelters in the community.
Equally important, well-crafted legislation will insulate community cats from licensing requirements, feeding bans, pet limits or other punitive laws that often impede the progress of sterilization efforts and public health protection. In addition, adopting a TNVR ordinance can make grant funding more available, since this legal assurance speaks volumes about the level of community support and involvement.
What about liability to the municipalities that implement a TNVR program?
Many community cats are unsocialized and tend to avoid people whenever possible. Also, in most TNVR programs, community cats are vaccinated against rabies, greatly reducing the likelihood of a person being severely injured.
Liability should not be a concern for municipalities that implement TNVR programs for the purpose of reducing cat populations, protecting public health through vaccination efforts or resolving nuisance complaints. These are all state interests worthy of government involvement. TNVR is a standard method of protecting public health, safety and welfare through feline vaccination and sterilization, while at the same time managing the population of community cats in a humane manner.
What happens if you trap an owned pet cat?
If a cat is found outdoors with a collar and identification or microchip, he can be returned to his home. Community cats, by definition, are cats who are found outdoors with no indicia of ownership. All cats who fall into that category are treated equally in successful TNVR programs. The success of any community cat program is contingent on sterilizing the majority, if not all, outdoor cats in the vicinity. Therefore, all community cats should be physically evaluated, sterilized, vaccinated, ear-tipped and returned to the area where they were trapped.